@proceedings {7280,
	title = {Use of Petri Nets to Model the Maintenance of Multi Site Compagny},
	journal = {International Congress of Energies and Engineering of Industrial ProcessesCEGPI{\textquoteright}22, 23 - 25 May},
	year = {2022},
	address = {Algiers, Algeria},
	author = {Soltani Khaoula and Messaoud, Benzouai and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed}
}
@proceedings {64717,
	title = {Proposal of a flexible and universal survey generator for a Business Intelligence},
	journal = {2018 6th International Conference on Control Engineering \& Information Technology (CEIT)},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2018},
	pages = {1-6},
	publisher = {IEEE},
	isbn = {1-5386-7641-9},
	author = {Samia, Aitouche and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed and Samira, Brahmi}
}
@article {64592,
	title = {The MAED and SVM for fault diagnosis of wind turbine system},
	journal = {International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER)International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER)},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2017},
	month = {2017},
	pages = {758-769},
	isbn = {1309-0127},
	author = {Abdelkrim, Soussa and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed and Samia, Aitouche and Hayet, MELAKHESSOU and Mawloud, Titah}
}
@article {61661,
	title = {Comparison and prioritization of measurement methods of intellectual capital; IC-dVal, VAIC and NICI},
	journal = {International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital},
	volume = {12},
	number = {2},
	year = {2015},
	pages = {122-145},
	abstract = {
	The purpose of this paper is to compare between three methods of intellectual capital (IC) measurement; intellectual capital dynamic valuation (IC-dVal), value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC), and national intellectual capital index (NICI). The three methods are the most used in practice; we used 24 criteria covering important aspects of IC to do general comparison. According to ten criteria, we compared and prioritised them using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The results of this comparison show that the methods are close for some criteria and distant for other criteria. The prioritisation with AHP found that NICI method is the most method responding to the criteria, namely: macro measure, guidelines of the method, dynamic valuation, involved levels of business, usability by stakeholders, covered aspects of IC, quantifiability, frequency of use and applicability. IC-dVal is the second one and VAIC is the third method responding to the criteria. The analysis could give more significant results using larger set of criteria. This is the first research prioritising methods of measurement of IC using AHP analysis.

},
	url = {https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJLIC.2015.068984},
	author = {Samia, Aitouche and Nadia, Mouss Kinza and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed and Abdelghafour, Kaanit and Tarek, Marref}
}
@proceedings {66236,
	title = {An implementation tool for the expertise model using CommonKADS methodology},
	journal = {The Sixth International Conference on Information, Process, and Knowledge Management, eKNOW},
	year = {2014},
	month = {2014},
	publisher = {Citeseer},
	author = {Mawloud, Titah and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed and Samia, Aitouche}
}
@article {66548,
	title = {Siad Scimat 2.0, Aide {\`a} la d{\'e}cision pour un syst{\`e}me de production},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013},
	author = {Samia, Aitouche and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed and Kinza, Mouss and Abdelghafour, Kaanit and Kamel, Taouririt and Samira, Brahmi}
}
@article {66886,
	title = {Comparative study, based on metamodels, of methods for controlling performance},
	journal = {International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI)International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI)},
	volume = {9},
	year = {2012},
	month = {2012},
	pages = {1},
	isbn = {1694-0814},
	author = {Samia, Aitouche and Djamel, Mouss Mohamed and Sylvie, Ratte and Abdelghafour, Kaanit and Kinza, Mouss and Hayet, Mouss}
}
